[Translated article] Postsurgical analgesic efficacy by the intra-articular administration of ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine versus simple ropivacaine in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy.

The effective relief of postsurgical pain in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy is important to allow the initiation of activities of daily living. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant added to ropivacaine by the intra-articular route. METHOD: Seventy patients underwent knee arthroscopy which were randomly assigned into two groups (n=35). The RD group received ropivacaine 1.5mg/kg plus dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg intra-articularly. Group R received ropivacaine 1.5mg/kg intra-articularly. The analgesic effect was evaluated by measuring the intensity of pain (VAS score) and the duration of analgesia. RESULTS: A longer duration of the analgesic effect was observed in the RD group (655min) compared to the R group (318min) being statistically significant (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to intra-articular ropivacaine improves the quality and duration of postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy.

Postsurgical analgesic efficacy by the intra-articular administration of ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine versus simple ropivacaine in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. / Eficacia analgésica posquirúrgica en la administración intraarticular de ropivacaína con dexmedetomidina en comparación con ropivacaína simple en pacientes intervenidos de artroscopia de rodilla.

The effective relief of postsurgical pain in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy is important to allow the initiation of activities of daily living. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant added to ropivacaine by the intra-articular route. METHOD: Seventy patients underwent knee arthroscopy which were randomly assigned into two groups (n=35). The RD group received ropivacaine 1.5mg/kg plus dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg intra-articularly. Group R received ropivacaine 1.5mg/kg intra-articularly. The analgesic effect was evaluated by measuring the intensity of pain (VAS score) and the duration of analgesia. RESULTS: A longer duration of the analgesic effect was observed in the RD group (655min) compared to the R group (318min) being statistically significant (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to intra-articular ropivacaine improves the quality and duration of postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy.

Factores pronósticos de complicaciones postquirúrgicas en pacientes con infecciones óseas y seudoartrosis / Prognostic factors for post surgical complications in bone infection and pseudarthrosis

Resumen: La infección ósea y la seudoartrosis son las principales complicaciones ortopédicas en cuyo tratamiento intervienen múltiples factores en la tasa de falla al tratar de corregirlas. Conocer estos factores fue el problema que originó la investigación a través de un estudio longitudinal y prospectivo de una cohorte histórica de 83 pacientes de 43.3 ± 16.1 años de edad tratados por seudoartrosis asépticas y sépticas, osteomielitis, osteítis, consolidación viciosa o prótesis infectadas, el desenlace se relacionó con los factores pronósticos sistémicos y locales tomados del modelo de Cierny-Mader como factores que afectan la vigilancia inmunológica, el metabolismo y la vascularización local. Para el análisis bivariado se aplicó χ2 o el test exacto de Fisher; para el análisis multivariado se aplicó el modelo de regresión logística binaria no condicional con método de Wald hacia atrás para seleccionar los factores pronósticos significativos. El error alfa se fijó ≤ 0.05. Las complicaciones se presentaron en 51.8% de los casos. Los factores locales (linfedema, arteritis, insuficiencia venosa y pérdida de piel) con una OR de 5.0 (IC 95% 1.0-24.9, p = 0.03), las seudoartrosis sépticas con OR de 5.0 (IC 95% 1.9-13.0, p = 0.001) y fracturas segmentarias con OR de 3.2 (IC 95% 0.8-13.0, p = 0.07) fueron los factores pronósticos identificados en el análisis bivariado; sin embargo, la regresión logística sólo seleccionó como factor significativo a las seudoartrosis sépticas. Es necesario detectar y en su caso controlar o eliminar dichos factores que pueden incidir directamente en malos resultados postquirúrgicos.

Abstract: Bone infection and nonunion are the main orthopedic and traumatic complications whose treatment remains a challenge because multiple factors are involved in the rate of failures when you try to correct them. Knowing these factors were the problem that caused the research through a prospective longitudinal study of 83 patients of 43.3 ± 16.1 years old. They were treated for aseptic and septic nonunion, osteomyelitis, osteitis, malunion or infected joint replacement. The cases were classified with or without postoperative complications and outcome related to systemic and local factors taken prognostic model Cierny-Mader as factors affecting immune surveillance, metabolism and local vascularization. For bivariate analysis of data χ2 it was applied or where appropriate Fisher's exact test; for multivariate analysis model not conditional binary logistic regression method was applied Wald backward to select the significant prognostic factors. The alpha error was set ≤ 0.05. General complications occurred in 51.8% of cases. Local factors (lymphedema, arteritis, venous insufficiency, loss of skin) with an OR of 5.0 (95% CI 1.0-24.9, p = 0.03), septic nonunion with OR of 5.0 (95% CI 1.9-13.0, p = 0.001) and segmental fractures with an OR of 3.2 (95% CI 0.8-13.0, p = 0.07) were the prognostic factors identified in the bivariate analysis; however, the logistic regression only selected as the septic pseudoarthrosis as a significant factor. It is necessary to detect and if necessary control or eliminate those factors that can directly affect poor postoperative results.

[Prognostic factors for post surgical complications in bone infection and pseudarthrosis]. / Factores pronósticos de complicaciones postquirúrgicas en pacientes con infecciones óseas y seudoartrosis.

Bone infection and nonunion are the main orthopedic and traumatic complications whose treatment remains a challenge because multiple factors are involved in the rate of failures when you try to correct them. Knowing these factors were the problem that caused the research through a prospective longitudinal study of 83 patients of 43.3 ± 16.1 years old. They were treated for aseptic and septic nonunion, osteomyelitis, osteitis, malunion or infected joint replacement. The cases were classified with or without postoperative complications and outcome related to systemic and local factors taken prognostic model Cierny-Mader as factors affecting immune surveillance, metabolism and local vascularization. For bivariate analysis of data Χ² it was applied or where appropriate Fishers exact test; for multivariate analysis model not conditional binary logistic regression method was applied Wald backward to select the significant prognostic factors. The alpha error was set 0.05. General complications occurred in 51.8% of cases. Local factors (lymphedema, arteritis, venous insufficiency, loss of skin) with an OR of 5.0 (95% CI 1.0-24.9, p = 0.03), septic nonunion with OR of 5.0 (95% CI 1.9-13.0, p = 0.001) and segmental fractures with an OR of 3.2 (95% CI 0.8-13.0, p = 0.07) were the prognostic factors identified in the bivariate analysis; however, the logistic regression only selected as the septic pseudoarthrosis as a significant factor. It is necessary to detect and if necessary control or eliminate those factors that can directly affect poor postoperative results.

La infección ósea y la seudoartrosis son las principales complicaciones ortopédicas en cuyo tratamiento intervienen múltiples factores en la tasa de falla al tratar de corregirlas. Conocer estos factores fue el problema que originó la investigación a través de un estudio longitudinal y prospectivo de una cohorte histórica de 83 pacientes de 43.3 ± 16.1 años de edad tratados por seudoartrosis asépticas y sépticas, osteomielitis, osteítis, consolidación viciosa o prótesis infectadas, el desenlace se relacionó con los factores pronósticos sistémicos y locales tomados del modelo de Cierny-Mader como factores que afectan la vigilancia inmunológica, el metabolismo y la vascularización local. Para el análisis bivariado se aplicó Χ² o el test exacto de Fisher; para el análisis multivariado se aplicó el modelo de regresión logística binaria no condicional con método de Wald hacia atrás para seleccionar los factores pronósticos significativos. El error alfa se fijó 0.05. Las complicaciones se presentaron en 51.8% de los casos. Los factores locales (linfedema, arteritis, insuficiencia venosa y pérdida de piel) con una OR de 5.0 (IC 95% 1.0-24.9, p = 0.03), las seudoartrosis sépticas con OR de 5.0 (IC 95% 1.9-13.0, p = 0.001) y fracturas segmentarias con OR de 3.2 (IC 95% 0.8-13.0, p = 0.07) fueron los factores pronósticos identificados en el análisis bivariado; sin embargo, la regresión logística sólo seleccionó como factor significativo a las seudoartrosis sépticas. Es necesario detectar y en su caso controlar o eliminar dichos factores que pueden incidir directamente en malos resultados postquirúrgicos.